<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218628</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for a fresh decision with a reasonable opportunity of hearing for the appellants. The Lower Appellate Authority was directed to ensure proper calculations in line with the retrospectively amended law before confirming demands, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218628</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for a fresh decision with a reasonable opportunity of hearing for the appellants. The Lower Appellate Authority was directed to ensure proper calculations in line with the retrospectively amended law before confirming demands, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>