<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 640 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218625</link>
    <description>Refund entitlement for aviation fuel supplied to foreign-bound flights could not be denied merely for procedural non-compliance where reliable material showed that the substantive conditions of the exemption were met. The analysis stressed that prescribed documentation defects do not defeat a claim if the underlying statutory or notification-based requirements are otherwise established. Because the dispute was heavily factual and the existing record required fuller appraisal, the matter was remitted to the revisional authority for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to examine the evidence and decide the refund claim afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 640 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218625</link>
      <description>Refund entitlement for aviation fuel supplied to foreign-bound flights could not be denied merely for procedural non-compliance where reliable material showed that the substantive conditions of the exemption were met. The analysis stressed that prescribed documentation defects do not defeat a claim if the underlying statutory or notification-based requirements are otherwise established. Because the dispute was heavily factual and the existing record required fuller appraisal, the matter was remitted to the revisional authority for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to examine the evidence and decide the refund claim afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>