https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218619 The court directed respondent No.3 to consider and decide the stay application expeditiously to prevent the petitioner from suffering substantially. The court mandated respondent No.3 to decide the applications for stay within 15 days and make efforts to decide all appeals within three months. No coercive action was allowed against the petitioner until the stay application was decided or for a specific period. The judgment stressed the importance of timely resolution of legal matters to avoid adverse consequences for the petitioner's career. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218619 The court directed respondent No.3 to consider and decide the stay application expeditiously to prevent the petitioner from suffering substantially. The court mandated respondent No.3 to decide the applications for stay within 15 days and make efforts to decide all appeals within three months. No coercive action was allowed against the petitioner until the stay application was decided or for a specific period. The judgment stressed the importance of timely resolution of legal matters to avoid adverse consequences for the petitioner's career. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218619