<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218614</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of accurate documentation and the nature of goods exported in determining eligibility for tax benefits under Section 80 HHC. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 HHC for dimensional granite blocks was rejected due to discrepancies in export documentation, leading to the denial of the tax benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218614</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of accurate documentation and the nature of goods exported in determining eligibility for tax benefits under Section 80 HHC. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 HHC for dimensional granite blocks was rejected due to discrepancies in export documentation, leading to the denial of the tax benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>