<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 609 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, finding that they were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid on aluminum alloy billets due to incorrect duty assessment. Despite the Customs department&#039;s failure to update duty rates in their system, the importers were able to demonstrate their entitlement to the refund for captive consumption goods. The Tribunal emphasized that in cases of captive consumption, the burden of proof on non-passing of duty incidence is not onerous, and the importers&#039; awareness of the refund eligibility sufficed. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the refund in cash, disposing of the appeal in favor of the importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 609 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, finding that they were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid on aluminum alloy billets due to incorrect duty assessment. Despite the Customs department&#039;s failure to update duty rates in their system, the importers were able to demonstrate their entitlement to the refund for captive consumption goods. The Tribunal emphasized that in cases of captive consumption, the burden of proof on non-passing of duty incidence is not onerous, and the importers&#039; awareness of the refund eligibility sufficed. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the refund in cash, disposing of the appeal in favor of the importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>