<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 603 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218588</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found no merit in the petitioners&#039; contentions of prejudgment by the Commissioner and upheld the validity of the impugned notice. It emphasized the petitioners&#039; right to present their defenses and objections during the adjudication process, without the need for a writ of prohibition to halt the proceedings. The court clarified the jurisdiction of the authorities and the availability of remedies through appeal and revision, ultimately dismissing the petition in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 603 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218588</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found no merit in the petitioners&#039; contentions of prejudgment by the Commissioner and upheld the validity of the impugned notice. It emphasized the petitioners&#039; right to present their defenses and objections during the adjudication process, without the need for a writ of prohibition to halt the proceedings. The court clarified the jurisdiction of the authorities and the availability of remedies through appeal and revision, ultimately dismissing the petition in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>