https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218583 The majority order in the case found that the first applicant had not prima facie established the use of the required percentage of fly ash for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The first applicant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 4.5 crores towards duty. The second applicant was found to have abetted the first applicant and was required to pre-deposit Rs. 4 lakhs towards penalty. Both pre-deposits were to be made within six weeks, with a stay on the recovery of the balance amount pending appeals. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218583 The majority order in the case found that the first applicant had not prima facie established the use of the required percentage of fly ash for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The first applicant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 4.5 crores towards duty. The second applicant was found to have abetted the first applicant and was required to pre-deposit Rs. 4 lakhs towards penalty. Both pre-deposits were to be made within six weeks, with a stay on the recovery of the balance amount pending appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218583