https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218581 The court quashed the Settlement Commission's order dated 18-1-2011 and directed both parties to reapproach the Settlement Commission within eight weeks. The petitioner must provide actual MRP details for subsequent years, and the Commission should calculate the MRP as per Rule 4A of the Central Excise Rules, 2008, determining the differential duty, interest, fine, and penalty. Immunity from prosecution was not granted due to the challenge, and the Commission was instructed to independently adjudicate the matter. Each party was responsible for their costs, and both petitions were disposed of. en-us Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218581 The court quashed the Settlement Commission's order dated 18-1-2011 and directed both parties to reapproach the Settlement Commission within eight weeks. The petitioner must provide actual MRP details for subsequent years, and the Commission should calculate the MRP as per Rule 4A of the Central Excise Rules, 2008, determining the differential duty, interest, fine, and penalty. Immunity from prosecution was not granted due to the challenge, and the Commission was instructed to independently adjudicate the matter. Each party was responsible for their costs, and both petitions were disposed of. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218581