<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 578 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218563</link>
    <description>The appeal arose from an order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, challenging the cancellation of an assessment completed by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner found discrepancies in the assessment process but the Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing that a mere difference in opinion does not justify revising the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 578 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218563</link>
      <description>The appeal arose from an order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, challenging the cancellation of an assessment completed by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner found discrepancies in the assessment process but the Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing that a mere difference in opinion does not justify revising the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>