https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218557 The Court concluded that the reliefs sought by the Plaintiffs were not barred by Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, as they were based on already vested rights and common law rights, not on enforcing contractual rights. The Plaintiffs were granted interim reliefs, and the Defendants were directed to maintain the status quo regarding the suit property. The hearing of the suit was expedited, and the Defendants were directed to file their written statements within four weeks. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218557 The Court concluded that the reliefs sought by the Plaintiffs were not barred by Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, as they were based on already vested rights and common law rights, not on enforcing contractual rights. The Plaintiffs were granted interim reliefs, and the Defendants were directed to maintain the status quo regarding the suit property. The hearing of the suit was expedited, and the Defendants were directed to file their written statements within four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218557