<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 569 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim, stating that the excess duty was refundable at the initial assessment stage without the need for further reassessment. The lack of challenge to the Bill of Entry did not affect the validity of the claim, as the dispute focused on duty payment calculation. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the completeness of assessment at clearance and the refundability of excess duty without additional reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 569 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim, stating that the excess duty was refundable at the initial assessment stage without the need for further reassessment. The lack of challenge to the Bill of Entry did not affect the validity of the claim, as the dispute focused on duty payment calculation. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the completeness of assessment at clearance and the refundability of excess duty without additional reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>