<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 551 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 regarding depreciation not debited to the Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account and interest-free advances, citing lack of proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal did not sustain the order concerning bad debts claimed by the assessee, finding that the AO had considered relevant submissions on this issue. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 551 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 regarding depreciation not debited to the Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account and interest-free advances, citing lack of proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal did not sustain the order concerning bad debts claimed by the assessee, finding that the AO had considered relevant submissions on this issue. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>