<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 549 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218534</link>
    <description>Interest on advances to sister concerns and capitalisation of borrowed-fund costs for machinery was disallowed where the Tribunal followed its earlier view that borrowed funds used for non-business purposes attract disallowance. Unaccounted interest income on alleged undisclosed investment was not sustained, as the issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s favour in an earlier year. Stock shortage on physical verification was accepted as a genuine business loss. No disallowance under section 14A was made because the investment was made under Government direction and no exempt income arose. A closing stock valuation reduction was allowed despite absence of a revised return, since the accounting method was consistently followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 549 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218534</link>
      <description>Interest on advances to sister concerns and capitalisation of borrowed-fund costs for machinery was disallowed where the Tribunal followed its earlier view that borrowed funds used for non-business purposes attract disallowance. Unaccounted interest income on alleged undisclosed investment was not sustained, as the issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s favour in an earlier year. Stock shortage on physical verification was accepted as a genuine business loss. No disallowance under section 14A was made because the investment was made under Government direction and no exempt income arose. A closing stock valuation reduction was allowed despite absence of a revised return, since the accounting method was consistently followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>