<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 536 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218521</link>
    <description>For section 10A, incidental business receipts linked to the export activity, including miscellaneous income, credit balance written back, notice period salary recovered from employees, foreign exchange fluctuation gain, and inter-unit transfers to a US branch approved under STPI, were treated as eligible profits or qualifying export turnover. Interest earned on temporary parking of funds was treated as income from other sources and excluded from the deduction because it was not derived from export operations. Remittances to the US branch did not attract tax deduction under section 195, so no disallowance arose under section 40(a)(ia), as the branch was not treated as a non-resident payee and only sums chargeable in India require TDS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 536 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218521</link>
      <description>For section 10A, incidental business receipts linked to the export activity, including miscellaneous income, credit balance written back, notice period salary recovered from employees, foreign exchange fluctuation gain, and inter-unit transfers to a US branch approved under STPI, were treated as eligible profits or qualifying export turnover. Interest earned on temporary parking of funds was treated as income from other sources and excluded from the deduction because it was not derived from export operations. Remittances to the US branch did not attract tax deduction under section 195, so no disallowance arose under section 40(a)(ia), as the branch was not treated as a non-resident payee and only sums chargeable in India require TDS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>