<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218514</link>
    <description>In the winding up of an insolvent company, the pari passu charge in favour of workmen under Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act is confined to the secured asset and to the workmen&#039;s portion in that security. A secured creditor&#039;s right does not extend to assets not mortgaged to it, and unsecured assets remain available to unsecured creditors and the winding up estate. The overriding preference under Section 529A applies only to workmen&#039;s dues and the secured creditor&#039;s debt to the extent it ranks pari passu with those dues. The contrary view was rejected, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218514</link>
      <description>In the winding up of an insolvent company, the pari passu charge in favour of workmen under Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act is confined to the secured asset and to the workmen&#039;s portion in that security. A secured creditor&#039;s right does not extend to assets not mortgaged to it, and unsecured assets remain available to unsecured creditors and the winding up estate. The overriding preference under Section 529A applies only to workmen&#039;s dues and the secured creditor&#039;s debt to the extent it ranks pari passu with those dues. The contrary view was rejected, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>