<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 528 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax liability on fees paid to Mandated Lead Arrangers (MLAs) for syndicated loans, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments on time limitation and classification of services. It found a nexus between arrangement and lending services, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s suppression of facts and directing a pre-deposit based on the balance of convenience.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 528 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax liability on fees paid to Mandated Lead Arrangers (MLAs) for syndicated loans, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments on time limitation and classification of services. It found a nexus between arrangement and lending services, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s suppression of facts and directing a pre-deposit based on the balance of convenience.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>