<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 524 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218509</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal found that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to support their claim of despatches being on FOR basis, but the first appellate authority&#039;s decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to produce additional documents by the order date. The tribunal emphasized the importance of reevaluating all necessary documents to determine the nature of despatches and instructed the appellant to cooperate with the adjudicating authority in providing required verification. Ultimately, the stay petitions and appeals were disposed of with the decision to remand the matter for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 524 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218509</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal found that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to support their claim of despatches being on FOR basis, but the first appellate authority&#039;s decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to produce additional documents by the order date. The tribunal emphasized the importance of reevaluating all necessary documents to determine the nature of despatches and instructed the appellant to cooperate with the adjudicating authority in providing required verification. Ultimately, the stay petitions and appeals were disposed of with the decision to remand the matter for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>