<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 507 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218492</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 80IA on the profits derived from the eligible Wind Mill I unit without adjusting the losses from Wind Mill II and III. The ITAT emphasized the importance of following binding precedents and clarified the interpretation of section 80IA in the specific case context, diverging from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that losses should be adjusted before allowing the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 507 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218492</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 80IA on the profits derived from the eligible Wind Mill I unit without adjusting the losses from Wind Mill II and III. The ITAT emphasized the importance of following binding precedents and clarified the interpretation of section 80IA in the specific case context, diverging from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that losses should be adjusted before allowing the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>