<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 500 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the appellant. The application for condonation of delay was rejected due to the lack of &#039;sufficient cause.&#039; Consequently, the appeals for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 were dismissed as the appellant was treated as non-registered under Section 12AA. The appeal against the rectification order was also dismissed, as there was no apparent mistake in the CIT&#039;s order granting registration from A.Y. 2009-10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 500 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the appellant. The application for condonation of delay was rejected due to the lack of &#039;sufficient cause.&#039; Consequently, the appeals for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 were dismissed as the appellant was treated as non-registered under Section 12AA. The appeal against the rectification order was also dismissed, as there was no apparent mistake in the CIT&#039;s order granting registration from A.Y. 2009-10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>