<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 494 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification and taxability of services prior to 01.06.2007 under specific service categories, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim that these services were not taxable before this date. It was determined that free issue material should have been included in the taxable value of services provided. The appellant&#039;s availing of CENVAT Credit disqualified them from claiming the benefit of Notification No.1/2006-ST. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s financial hardship, the Tribunal required a partial pre-deposit of Rs.4.5 crores, granting a stay against the recovery of the balance amounts upon deposit within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 494 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification and taxability of services prior to 01.06.2007 under specific service categories, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim that these services were not taxable before this date. It was determined that free issue material should have been included in the taxable value of services provided. The appellant&#039;s availing of CENVAT Credit disqualified them from claiming the benefit of Notification No.1/2006-ST. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s financial hardship, the Tribunal required a partial pre-deposit of Rs.4.5 crores, granting a stay against the recovery of the balance amounts upon deposit within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>