<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 488 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218473</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the activity constituted job work and that the value addition condition was met as required by Notification No.32/97/Cus. The Court emphasized that the use of indigenous materials did not disqualify the respondent from the exemption. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the respondent, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 488 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218473</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the activity constituted job work and that the value addition condition was met as required by Notification No.32/97/Cus. The Court emphasized that the use of indigenous materials did not disqualify the respondent from the exemption. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the respondent, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>