<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicants&#039; request to waive a redemption fine, stating it lacks the authority to do so. The Tribunal clarified it can only waive duty and penalty deposits for appeals under Sec.35F of the Central Excise Act. The application for modification was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicants&#039; request to waive a redemption fine, stating it lacks the authority to do so. The Tribunal clarified it can only waive duty and penalty deposits for appeals under Sec.35F of the Central Excise Act. The application for modification was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>