<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellants. The demand for duty was deemed unjustified due to the absence of revenue loss and the payment of appropriate duty by the other party. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and legal provisions in determining duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellants. The demand for duty was deemed unjustified due to the absence of revenue loss and the payment of appropriate duty by the other party. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and legal provisions in determining duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>