<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the demand of Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty on molasses received from a sugar factory. The appellants demonstrated that the molasses had already been cleared by the manufacturing unit after paying the required duty, thus avoiding double taxation. The Tribunal concluded that the demand was unsustainable, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal. The appellants were found not liable to pay the demanded amount due to the prior duty payment on the molasses by the manufacturing unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the demand of Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty on molasses received from a sugar factory. The appellants demonstrated that the molasses had already been cleared by the manufacturing unit after paying the required duty, thus avoiding double taxation. The Tribunal concluded that the demand was unsustainable, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal. The appellants were found not liable to pay the demanded amount due to the prior duty payment on the molasses by the manufacturing unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>