<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 464 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the estimation of construction cost of a factory building for Assessment Year 2004-05. It found discrepancies in the valuation reports and the A.O.&#039;s failure to reject the books of account before referring the matter to the Valuation Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal procedures, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 464 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the estimation of construction cost of a factory building for Assessment Year 2004-05. It found discrepancies in the valuation reports and the A.O.&#039;s failure to reject the books of account before referring the matter to the Valuation Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal procedures, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>