<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 463 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalties were challenged due to cash transactions allegedly violating sections 269SS and 269T. The authorities found that the transactions in question did not qualify as loans or deposits as per the Act, thus rendering the penalties unjustified. Both levels of adjudication concurred that the lack of loan or deposit characteristics exempted the transactions from penalties, leading to the dismissal of the appeals against the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 463 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalties were challenged due to cash transactions allegedly violating sections 269SS and 269T. The authorities found that the transactions in question did not qualify as loans or deposits as per the Act, thus rendering the penalties unjustified. Both levels of adjudication concurred that the lack of loan or deposit characteristics exempted the transactions from penalties, leading to the dismissal of the appeals against the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>