<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 442 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority due to the non-receipt of relied upon documents by the appellant before the adjudication stage. The appellant&#039;s defense was affected as they received these crucial documents only after the adjudication order was passed. The Tribunal acknowledged the significance of the documents in the appellant&#039;s plea and defense, emphasizing the need for a reconsideration of the issue by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the delay in raising the issue but directed a prompt resolution within six months, with the appellant required to deposit a specified amount for the hearing and disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 442 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority due to the non-receipt of relied upon documents by the appellant before the adjudication stage. The appellant&#039;s defense was affected as they received these crucial documents only after the adjudication order was passed. The Tribunal acknowledged the significance of the documents in the appellant&#039;s plea and defense, emphasizing the need for a reconsideration of the issue by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the delay in raising the issue but directed a prompt resolution within six months, with the appellant required to deposit a specified amount for the hearing and disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>