<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218423</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78, while rejecting the appeal against the penalty under Section 76. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation, the non-mandatory nature of the penalty under Section 76, and the provisions of Section 80 allowing for non-imposition of penalty on reasonable cause being shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218423</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78, while rejecting the appeal against the penalty under Section 76. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation, the non-mandatory nature of the penalty under Section 76, and the provisions of Section 80 allowing for non-imposition of penalty on reasonable cause being shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>