https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218421 The appeal was allowed as the confirmation of the demand of the amount paid by the appellant during the case was set aside due to being time-barred under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The adjudicating authority's findings emphasized the delay in action by the department and the lack of appeal by Revenue authorities against the limitation issue. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential relief, highlighting the importance of adhering to limitation periods in demanding duties and the significance of challenging such demands on legal grounds. en-us Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218421 The appeal was allowed as the confirmation of the demand of the amount paid by the appellant during the case was set aside due to being time-barred under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The adjudicating authority's findings emphasized the delay in action by the department and the lack of appeal by Revenue authorities against the limitation issue. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential relief, highlighting the importance of adhering to limitation periods in demanding duties and the significance of challenging such demands on legal grounds. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218421