<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 419 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218404</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the addition made by the A.O. based on explanations provided regarding the source of cash deposits. ITAT concluded that no addition was warranted, directing deletion of the amount added by the A.O. The decision emphasized the importance of substantiated explanations and supporting documentation in such cases to avoid unexplained cash credit additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 419 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218404</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the addition made by the A.O. based on explanations provided regarding the source of cash deposits. ITAT concluded that no addition was warranted, directing deletion of the amount added by the A.O. The decision emphasized the importance of substantiated explanations and supporting documentation in such cases to avoid unexplained cash credit additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>