<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable on seized currency upon release under the Customs Act, as it falls under the definition of goods. It highlighted that only the High Court or Supreme Court could order interest payment for delays in returning seized goods, not the Tribunal. The order directing interest payment was set aside, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim for interest at an enhanced rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable on seized currency upon release under the Customs Act, as it falls under the definition of goods. It highlighted that only the High Court or Supreme Court could order interest payment for delays in returning seized goods, not the Tribunal. The order directing interest payment was set aside, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim for interest at an enhanced rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>