<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 405 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218390</link>
    <description>An order admitting a winding-up petition was held to be appealable, because the admission order substantially affected the company&#039;s interests and appellate provisions should be construed to preserve, not curtail, the right of appeal. The court also stated that such an admission order must be reasoned, since admission turns on whether a debt exists, whether the petitioner is a creditor, whether the company is unable to pay, and whether the defence is bona fide rather than a mere moonshine. The impugned admission order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 405 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218390</link>
      <description>An order admitting a winding-up petition was held to be appealable, because the admission order substantially affected the company&#039;s interests and appellate provisions should be construed to preserve, not curtail, the right of appeal. The court also stated that such an admission order must be reasoned, since admission turns on whether a debt exists, whether the petitioner is a creditor, whether the company is unable to pay, and whether the defence is bona fide rather than a mere moonshine. The impugned admission order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>