<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 397 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218382</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of Rs. 13,91,390 from an addition of Rs. 16,45,308 in a Sharafi account and disclosure during search was dismissed. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the deletion based on the principle of telescoping, directing the assessing officer to set-off the previous year&#039;s addition, providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal supported this decision, emphasizing the importance of avoiding double taxation of the same income and the necessity of proper documentation in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 397 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218382</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of Rs. 13,91,390 from an addition of Rs. 16,45,308 in a Sharafi account and disclosure during search was dismissed. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the deletion based on the principle of telescoping, directing the assessing officer to set-off the previous year&#039;s addition, providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal supported this decision, emphasizing the importance of avoiding double taxation of the same income and the necessity of proper documentation in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>