<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 394 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218379</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the assumption of jurisdiction under section 153-C of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the Assessing Officer failed to meet the condition precedent of bringing material belonging to the appellant, rendering the proceedings void ab initio. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal without addressing this ground, leading to a remittal for reevaluation. Additionally, the failure to review the assessment without valid reasons and the inadequate disposal of additional grounds during the appellate proceedings resulted in the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer due to lack of substantiation and supporting evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 394 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218379</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the assumption of jurisdiction under section 153-C of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the Assessing Officer failed to meet the condition precedent of bringing material belonging to the appellant, rendering the proceedings void ab initio. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal without addressing this ground, leading to a remittal for reevaluation. Additionally, the failure to review the assessment without valid reasons and the inadequate disposal of additional grounds during the appellate proceedings resulted in the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer due to lack of substantiation and supporting evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>