<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 393 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218378</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the partial addition of unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, reducing it to Rs.30,00,000 as an estimate. The tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate working and valuation reports to justify claims and WIP values, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and underscoring the need for fair assessment practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 393 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218378</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the partial addition of unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, reducing it to Rs.30,00,000 as an estimate. The tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate working and valuation reports to justify claims and WIP values, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and underscoring the need for fair assessment practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>