<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 383 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218368</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of shares should be classified as short-term capital gain rather than business income. The Tribunal found no new evidence presented by the revenue to warrant a different classification, citing consistency with previous rulings and the assessee&#039;s conversion of shares to an investment portfolio. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 383 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218368</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of shares should be classified as short-term capital gain rather than business income. The Tribunal found no new evidence presented by the revenue to warrant a different classification, citing consistency with previous rulings and the assessee&#039;s conversion of shares to an investment portfolio. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>