https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218366 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that appropriation of rebate claims under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 without notice was impermissible. It determined that appropriation during the pendency of a stay application was not legally sustainable, citing decisions of various High Courts. The Tribunal directed the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to refund the appropriated amount to the appellants along with interest in accordance with the law, setting aside the lower appellate authority's decision. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218366 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that appropriation of rebate claims under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 without notice was impermissible. It determined that appropriation during the pendency of a stay application was not legally sustainable, citing decisions of various High Courts. The Tribunal directed the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to refund the appropriated amount to the appellants along with interest in accordance with the law, setting aside the lower appellate authority's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218366