<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 375 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218360</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed a special leave petition due to a significant delay of 317 days in filing it, finding no sufficient cause for condonation. The court directed an enquiry by the Chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs to determine responsibility for the delay, emphasizing the need for accountability and efficiency in legal proceedings. The enquiry was to be completed within four weeks of receiving the court&#039;s order, with the Chairman required to submit a report promptly for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 375 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218360</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed a special leave petition due to a significant delay of 317 days in filing it, finding no sufficient cause for condonation. The court directed an enquiry by the Chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs to determine responsibility for the delay, emphasizing the need for accountability and efficiency in legal proceedings. The enquiry was to be completed within four weeks of receiving the court&#039;s order, with the Chairman required to submit a report promptly for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>