<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218359</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order in a Central Excise Act appeal, directing the Appellants to make a 25% duty deposit instead of the initial 50% duty and dispensing with the penalty deposit. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s original direction excessive compared to Supreme Court precedents. The appeal was disposed of with directions for the Tribunal to proceed on merits without treating the observations as conclusive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218359</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order in a Central Excise Act appeal, directing the Appellants to make a 25% duty deposit instead of the initial 50% duty and dispensing with the penalty deposit. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s original direction excessive compared to Supreme Court precedents. The appeal was disposed of with directions for the Tribunal to proceed on merits without treating the observations as conclusive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>