<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 373 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218358</link>
    <description>Notification No. 83/94-C.E. was examined in the context of a job worker seeking waiver of pre-deposit pending appeal. The notification required the supplier of raw material to furnish the undertaking that goods manufactured on job work basis would be used in the supplier&#039;s factory for manufacture of specified goods, and the text noted that this obligation did not extend to the job worker. As the applicant was only a job worker clearing goods on labour charges, a strong prima facie case was found for interim relief. The benefit of the notification was therefore not denied at the interim stage, and pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived with stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 373 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218358</link>
      <description>Notification No. 83/94-C.E. was examined in the context of a job worker seeking waiver of pre-deposit pending appeal. The notification required the supplier of raw material to furnish the undertaking that goods manufactured on job work basis would be used in the supplier&#039;s factory for manufacture of specified goods, and the text noted that this obligation did not extend to the job worker. As the applicant was only a job worker clearing goods on labour charges, a strong prima facie case was found for interim relief. The benefit of the notification was therefore not denied at the interim stage, and pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived with stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>