<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 361 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218346</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the applicant&#039;s application for restoration of appeal due to repeated dismissals for non-prosecution and failure to comply with conditions. The Tribunal noted delay tactics by the appellant in seeking waiver of pre-deposit, leading to a cost imposition of Rs.50,000 for restoration consideration. Emphasizing the substantial duty and penalty exceeding Rs.6 crores, the Tribunal underscored the need for procedural compliance and timely conduct in legal proceedings, reinforcing accountability and adherence to the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 361 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218346</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the applicant&#039;s application for restoration of appeal due to repeated dismissals for non-prosecution and failure to comply with conditions. The Tribunal noted delay tactics by the appellant in seeking waiver of pre-deposit, leading to a cost imposition of Rs.50,000 for restoration consideration. Emphasizing the substantial duty and penalty exceeding Rs.6 crores, the Tribunal underscored the need for procedural compliance and timely conduct in legal proceedings, reinforcing accountability and adherence to the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>