<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 353 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund of service tax on Port services, emphasizing that no authorization letter from the Port was required post the Finance Act amendment in 2010. The Tribunal ruled that services provided by authorized persons from the Port were eligible for refund under Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision focused on the criteria for sanctioning refunds and highlighted the need for compliance with statutory requirements for fair and consistent refund approvals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 353 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund of service tax on Port services, emphasizing that no authorization letter from the Port was required post the Finance Act amendment in 2010. The Tribunal ruled that services provided by authorized persons from the Port were eligible for refund under Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision focused on the criteria for sanctioning refunds and highlighted the need for compliance with statutory requirements for fair and consistent refund approvals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>