<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed the TPO to recompute the assessee&#039;s average gross profit margin for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Tribunal disagreed with the TPO&#039;s exclusion of certain comparable companies and instructed the use of revised filtration criteria. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the TPO for further assessment in line with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed the TPO to recompute the assessee&#039;s average gross profit margin for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Tribunal disagreed with the TPO&#039;s exclusion of certain comparable companies and instructed the use of revised filtration criteria. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the TPO for further assessment in line with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>