<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 346 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218331</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the DIT(E)&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the AO&#039;s computation of capital gains, though erroneous, was not prejudicial to the revenue. The tribunal held that the AO&#039;s approach was a possible view supported by judicial precedents. The appeal by the charitable trust was allowed, emphasizing that the trust had applied surplus income for charitable purposes, offsetting the capital gains not utilized under section 11(1A) of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 346 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218331</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the DIT(E)&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the AO&#039;s computation of capital gains, though erroneous, was not prejudicial to the revenue. The tribunal held that the AO&#039;s approach was a possible view supported by judicial precedents. The appeal by the charitable trust was allowed, emphasizing that the trust had applied surplus income for charitable purposes, offsetting the capital gains not utilized under section 11(1A) of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>