<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed against the CIT(A) orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Most grounds challenging various additions were dismissed due to lack of evidence or precedent support. The Tribunal upheld the addition of sums received from a charitable trust, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s burden to provide evidence. The claim regarding hiring charges for tools and plants was also dismissed for lack of supporting evidence. The issue of honorarium paid to the chairman was directed for further assessment by the Assessing Officer. The decision was rendered after a thorough analysis of each ground based on evidence and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed against the CIT(A) orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Most grounds challenging various additions were dismissed due to lack of evidence or precedent support. The Tribunal upheld the addition of sums received from a charitable trust, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s burden to provide evidence. The claim regarding hiring charges for tools and plants was also dismissed for lack of supporting evidence. The issue of honorarium paid to the chairman was directed for further assessment by the Assessing Officer. The decision was rendered after a thorough analysis of each ground based on evidence and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>