<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 23,20,000 under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants, shifting the onus to the Revenue. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and upholding the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 23,20,000 under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants, shifting the onus to the Revenue. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and upholding the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>