<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 329 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant CENVAT credit for the period before 1-4-2008 but denied credit for the period after 31-3-2008. The matter was remanded for quantification of admissible and inadmissible credit, with the appellant&#039;s right to be heard on the issue of requantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 329 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant CENVAT credit for the period before 1-4-2008 but denied credit for the period after 31-3-2008. The matter was remanded for quantification of admissible and inadmissible credit, with the appellant&#039;s right to be heard on the issue of requantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>