<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 319 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, deleting the additions made under Section 40(a)(ia). It was established that the appellant hired vehicles for its transportation business and did not sub-let the work, making Section 194C inapplicable. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the contract and relevant judicial precedents, confirming that the appellant performed the transportation work independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 319 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, deleting the additions made under Section 40(a)(ia). It was established that the appellant hired vehicles for its transportation business and did not sub-let the work, making Section 194C inapplicable. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the contract and relevant judicial precedents, confirming that the appellant performed the transportation work independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>