<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 302 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correctly applying the law and providing appellants with the opportunity to present their case in service tax refund matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 302 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correctly applying the law and providing appellants with the opportunity to present their case in service tax refund matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>