<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218285</link>
    <description>A conditional export exemption under Notification No. 17/2009-ST did not force an exporter to waive Cenvat credit, because the notification required a choice between exemption and credit rather than compulsory exemption. On that basis, denial of credit merely for not availing the exemption was unsustainable. CHA, clearing and forwarding agent, shipping agent and courier agency services were also recognised as eligible input services for export-related Cenvat credit, since their nexus with the export transaction was accepted and had already been treated favourably in the assessee&#039;s own case. The disallowance of credit and the consequential penalty therefore could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218285</link>
      <description>A conditional export exemption under Notification No. 17/2009-ST did not force an exporter to waive Cenvat credit, because the notification required a choice between exemption and credit rather than compulsory exemption. On that basis, denial of credit merely for not availing the exemption was unsustainable. CHA, clearing and forwarding agent, shipping agent and courier agency services were also recognised as eligible input services for export-related Cenvat credit, since their nexus with the export transaction was accepted and had already been treated favourably in the assessee&#039;s own case. The disallowance of credit and the consequential penalty therefore could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>